CALL

schedule

.

PROCESSING AND

shipping

.

The Innova-TIC 2023 call begins with the submission of proposals, through which teachers will make explicit the citizen, generic or specific competences that they seek to develop in students.

The proposals will have a technical component and a budgetary component, described in the Annex 1 y Annex 2, respectively.

Obtaining the endorsement of the proposals. 

In order to receive comments on academic aspects (the correspondence of the proposal against the Educational Project of the Program and the UIS21 Pedagogical Model) and on the aspects requested in this call, the proposal must be presented to the School Director or program coordinator in the case of IPRED. This meeting will result in an endorsement by the School Director or Program Coordinator in the IPRED, which must be completed in the format provided in the Annex 3.

Entrega de las propuestas* 

Finally, the professor will send the proposal to the Academic Vice-Rectory as established in annexes 1, 2 and 3, via Form, for which you must have previously completed the aforementioned annexes.

*On this link the form is available in PDF format to facilitate the application to the call.

REQUIREMENTS

verification

.

The proposals submitted within the deadline will be reviewed in compliance with the requirements and in their technical and budgetary component by an evaluation panel made up of ELTIC members. This verification will take place before the correction period, and aims to identify technical and budgetary difficulties for the execution of the proposal, considering the capacities and institutional resources foreseen for this call.

Correction is understood as the process of making suggested adjustments during the period of verification of requirements, both to the technical component and to the budgetary component, whether of a formal or conceptual nature.

At the end of this review, the results of the requirements verification will be published, specifying the proposals that meet, the proposals that need to be adjusted and the excluded proposals. The adjusted proposal will be sent, before the end of the correction period, to the Academic Vice-Rector’s Office in accordance with the instructions sent.

Once the final verification of requirements has been completed, the final results of this period will be published.

EVALUATION OF

proposals

.

The evaluation panel will assign a score to each proposal according to the criteria established in Table 1. The results of the selection and the corresponding scores will be published on the dates established in the call schedule. Each criterion will be evaluated on a scale of 0 to 3. The final score of the evaluation will correspond to the weighting established in Table 1.

Proposal Evaluation Criteria

The potential impact is evaluated according to three criteria: coverage of the beneficiary population, reusability of the resource or strategy, and integration with the virtual classroom of institutional learning.

The final products refer to the results that serve as evidence of the development of the proposal. The deliverables are commitments assumed by the proposer and that will be verified in the closing stage. (For examples of deliverables, see paragraph 6 of annex 1).

Innovation in teaching praxis seeks to evaluate the innovative nature of the didactic strategy.

Budgetary relevance takes into account the coherence between the resources requested through the budget component, with the final outputs and the planning of the proposal. Additionally, compliance with the instructions stipulated for the budget will be verified: items, maximum amounts, format, among others.

The inclusive education approach takes into account the incorporation of elements that promote this perspective at the Industrial University of Santander. This component includes universal design criteria for learning; For example: use of subtitles in audiovisual material, dubbing into Colombian sign language, adaptations for visual limitations and any type of didactic support aimed at prioritized populations. The assessment of this component takes into account the provisions of the Inclusive Education Policy of the Industrial University of Santander (Agreement of the Superior Council No. 32 of 2019) and the impact on the curricular dimension that was established in this policy.

The description of the relationship with the UIS21 Pedagogical Model considers the linkage in the proposal of the following aspects established in the MPUIS21:

1. Focused on learning and the subject who learns.

2. Oriented to training for innovation.

3. Assisted by the use of information and communication technologies.

4. Materialized in the imprint of the common traits of the graduates.

5. Deployed in the macro, meso and micro-curricular areas.

Additional Stimuli to Scoring

The applicant teams that meet, totally or partially, with the following specifications, will be entitled to incentives in the score, as follows:

• Promote Collective Work: Proposals that include two or more professors in any form of linkage, as proponents, will receive up to 3 tenths additional to the weighted score.

• Encourage the use of simulation tools: Proposals that contemplate the incorporation of simulation tools will receive up to 3 tenths additional to the weighted score.

• Encourage participation for the first time: Up to 3 tenths will be assigned to teams in which the members present themselves for the first time to the Innova-TIC call.

Selection of Winning Proposals

For a proposal to be considered within the list of winners, it must obtain at least 80% of the maximum possible score. The four (4) proposals that have achieved the highest scores will be declared winners.

The authors of those proposals selected as winners will be contacted by the Academic Vice-Rectory for the signing of the act of initiation of the development of the proposal.

Note: The cases of a tie will be settled by comparing the score obtained in the individual indicators, ordered according to weighting. (See Annex 4 -Evaluation guide for Innova-ICT proposals-). If the tie persists, the final winner will be selected randomly through the use of a computer tool.

PROPOSAL

execution

.

For the allocation of resources, the proponents will sign a initiation act where the commitments and outputs will be recorded, as well as the start and end dates. The selected proposals can be executed until November 30, 2023.

PROPOSAL

closure

.

The closure of the execution will take place when the fulfillment of the commitments is verified and the deliverables recorded in the initiation act are completed. The verification of all products will have a maximum period of one month after the scheduled completion date.

In addition to the delivery of the products, the applicant must:

1. Incorporate the products in the respective Virtual Classroom.

2. Deliver the certificate of participation in the course “University Policies: Pedagogical Model UIS21 – Recognizing us” offered by CEDEDUIS for each professor participating in the proposal.

3. Disclose in the respective Academic Unit the result of the implementation of the proposal, and attach minutes of faculty, school council, program council, or faculty as the case may be.

4. Present the result of the proposal at an event programmed by ELTIC.

5. Deliver a report containing lessons learned, recommendations and observations on the work done.

6. Authors must explicitly include their affiliation with the Universidad Industrial de Santander in all resulting products.

It is important to remind participants that as the Universidad Industrial de Santander is a public institution, subject to surveillance by state control bodies, unjustified non-compliance with the commitments acquired within the framework of this call may result in the respective sanctions depending on the type of link with the University.