To quantify the results of the contest, those responsible for the evaluation of each of the tests will use the guide that can be consulted in the Teacher Selection Regulations – Agreement No. 046 of 2021 on page 16 of the PDF.

After the deadline for receipt of resumes according to the established date, the Academic Vice-Rectory and the Evaluation Committee will verify compliance with the requirements of the call by the contestants.

The Academic Vice-Rectory will carry out the programming of the psychotechnical test among the applicants who meet the requirements set out in the summoned profile.

The psychotechnical test will be practiced by an entity designated by the university and will be evaluated taking into account the aspects indicated below:

1. Personality structure

2. Acceptance of others

3. Achievement satisfaction

4. Sharing experiences

5. Teamwork

6. Potential to develop a sense of belonging

In this scenario, the candidate seeks to demonstrate not only his competence in the disciplinary field, but also his competence to allow the access of others to the understanding of the information and to a know-how with it, this session will be circumscribed to the written proposal of teaching session presented.

In this sense, it should be borne in mind that a 30-minute session of learning mediation is a simulation and that, beyond evaluating the complex knowledge that the teacher possesses in the domain of educational sciences, he observes the teacher’s competencies to take advantage of communication scenarios to support learning. In this sense, the teaching session seeks to assess, in the mediator:

• The quality of dialogic processes in the classroom that, by their nature, must be horizontal, generating trust.

• The construction of a brief experience that motivates the interlocutors in front of the subject or topic of the session.

• The quality, depth and complexity of the knowledge treated, without detriment to the dosage, relevance and language proportional to the (supposed) competence of the interlocutors.

• The strategies of taking advantage of the interventions of the interlocutors to assess the understanding that they carry of the treatment of the subject.

• The ways of involving the interested interlocutors in the activity or teaching session.

• The use of the error of the interlocutors for the understanding of the subject, which implies metacognitive processes in the classroom.

• The flexibility of the plan or planned strategy to be appropriate to the reality of the interaction in the development of the teaching session.

• The way in which it articulates various information, the interest in investigating in sources other than what the teacher provides, the relationship of the subject treated with professional training in the domain of interest and depending on the commitment of the interlocutors with the world in which they live.

Prior to the development of the teaching session, the candidate must send the written proposal for a teaching session, defined as an alternative pedagogical and didactic action that aims to organize the teaching process to enhance learning and integral training. For this purpose, the written proposal must define theoretical bases of pedagogical, didactic and disciplinary order, from which previous knowledge is observed, teaching objectives and learning outcomes are established, classroom activities and didactic instruments are organized and related, in addition, the evaluation process is established.

The characteristics of the preparation of the written proposal of the teaching session will be the following: a maximum of 8,000 characters, including bibliography, preferably font Times New Roman, 12 and APA Standards for citations and references.

The teaching session with its content and formal elements, will be evaluated based on a series of criteria and indicators expressed in the assessment matrix found in more detail in the Teacher Selection Regulations – Agreement No. 046 of 2021 on page 18 of the PDF.

For the preparation of the research proposal in the disciplinary domain of the contest, the following terms will be taken into consideration:

• Statement of the research question or problem.

a) Relevance and timeliness of the state of the art.

b) Clarity in the description of the question or problem.

c) Timeliness and validity of the above approaches.

• Objectives:

Concordance with the problem or question.

• Methodology:

Relevance of the methodology for the achievement of the objectives.

• Schedule:

Correspondence with theoretical and methodological requirements.

• Clear identification of the expected results with their respective indicators in:

a) The generation of new knowledge.

(b) Strengthening the scientific community.

(c) Outreach strategies.

• Presentation of the proposal:

Writing and spelling.

• Bibliography:

Relevance and topicality.

• Budget:

Relevance of the items.

The characteristics of the elaboration of the research proposal will be the following: a maximum of 8,000 characters, including bibliography, preferably font Times New Roman, 12, and APA Standards for citations and references.

The research proposal must be submitted to execute in eighteen (18) months.

The evaluation of the research proposal, both in its written component and in the support, will be followed through the evaluation matrix detailed in the Faculty Selection Regulations – Agreement No. 046 of 2021 on page 19.

For the evaluation of the resume in the general competition, undergraduate and postgraduate degrees, certified experience (teaching, research and professional) and academic productivity will be taken into account, according to the aspects and scores indicated in the table that can be consulted in the Faculty Selection Regulations – Agreement N0. 046 of 2021 on page 22. 

For the General Contest, the assignment of resume scores will proceed as follows:

• Experience:

The Evaluation Committee will count the total number of years or fractions of a year that each candidate accredits as experience and will be ordered from highest to lowest.

All the points established for this criterion will be assigned to the candidate with the greatest number of years of experience. A proportional distribution will be made to assign the points to the other candidates.  2 points per year of experience

The years of experience may not be less than those required in the defined profile and for accounting purposes the simultaneous experience will be taken into account only once.

• Academic productivity:

The Evaluation Committee will evaluate the products certified by the candidate as established in Article 10 of Decree 1279 of 2002, the one that modifies, replaces, adds or replaces it, and the total scores of the candidates will be ordered from highest to lowest. Only the productivity of the last 10 years will be taken into account.

If there is more than one candidate, all the points established for this criterion will be assigned to the candidate with the highest score according to Decree 1279 of 2002, the one that modifies, replaces, adds or replaces it. A proportional distribution will be made to assign the points to the other candidates.

In no case may more than the score defined in the table be awarded.

For experience and intellectual production, only what is certified in the ten (10) years prior to the contest will be recognized.

When the certification of teaching experience is by the hour, one year of full-time equivalent teaching experience corresponds to the dedication of at least 12 hours per week of direct teaching during two academic semesters.

The score awarded in the qualification of the resume will apply only for the purposes of the teaching contest. To determine the hitch salary, the provisions of Decree 1279 of 2002 will be applied, the one that modifies, replaces, adds or replaces it.

If when qualifying the resume of an applicant, it is concluded that he does not meet any of the requirements to participate in the teaching contest or one of the requirements defined in the profile, the applicant will not continue in the process and therefore the qualification of his resume does not proceed.

For the evaluation of the resume in the contest of young talents, only the aspects and scores indicated in the table that can be consulted in the Teacher Selection Regulations – Agreement No. 046 of 2021 on page 21 of the PDF will be taken into account.

For the contest of young talents the assignment of resume scores will proceed as follows:

• Experience:

The Evaluation Committee will count the total number of years or fractions of a year that each candidate accredits as experience and will be ordered from highest to lowest.

All the points established for this criterion will be assigned to the candidate with the greatest number of years of experience. A proportional distribution will be made to assign the points to the other candidates.

The years of experience may not be less than those required in the defined profile and for accounting purposes the simultaneous experience will be taken into account only once.

• Regulated distinctions:

The Evaluation Committee will assess the awards and define the score to be awarded by type of recognition. All points will be assigned to the candidate with the highest number of points assigned by regulated distinctions and proportionally points will be assigned to the other candidates.

• Academic productivity:

The Evaluation Committee will evaluate the products accredited by the candidate as established in Decree 1279 of 2002, the one that modifies, replaces, adds or replaces it, and the total scores of the candidates will be ordered from highest to lowest.

All the points established for this criterion will be assigned to the candidate with the highest score according to Decree 1279. A proportional distribution will be made to assign the points to the other candidates. 

The interview seeks to identify relevant aspects of the candidate: personality, ability to live in community, tolerance, attitude towards teaching, ethics, rigor for work in the discipline and ability to commit to their own personal, intellectual, professional and teaching development and institutional empathy.